U.S. nativism ignores immigration’s cultural benefits

Since the founding of our republic, immigra­tion has cemented itself as a controversial yet necessary and imperative component of America’s societal structure and cultural prog­ress.

The first instance of nativist, knee-jerk re­sistance to the inevitability of immigration in the United States was the Alien and Sedition Acts, passed in 1798 as a means of solidify­ing Federalist control of the government and silencing critics (many of whom were immi­grants themselves).

Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, many pieces of legislation were passed lim­iting immigration or outright discriminating against foreigners (Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, migratory quotas of the 1920’s, etc.).

The fiery rhetoric of Republican presiden­tial candidate Donald Trump is an alarming reminder of the omnipresent sentiments of nativism and anti-immigration that are still present within many sects of the American populace.

Common assertions made by anti-immigra­tion activists such as Trump include the no­tion that immigrants (particularly those from Mexico and Latin America) are “stealing” jobs from Americans, driving up unemployment, that immigrants threaten traditional American institutions and (perhaps most inflammato­ry and offensive) that foreign countries send criminals who, as Trump claims, “The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everybody else’s problems… It’s true, and these are the best and the finest.

When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not send­ing you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” (The Washington Post, “Donald Trump’s ‘Mexican rapists’ rhet­oric will keep the Republican Party out of the White House”, 06.17.2015).

Individuals in Trump’s camp seem to forget that the United States is a country where 100% of its population are the descendants of immi­grants. In order for massive overhauls of the immigration system to be successful, reform must start in the minds of our citizens.

Immigrants are often times driven to ille­gally enter the United States due to economic conditions in their respective home countries, in search of the “American dream.” The reality is often that illegal immigrants take minimum wage level jobs and find themselves in poverty.

However, immigration continues to rise as these conditions are still more stable than the ones found in immigrants’ native homes. Over the last decade, the rate of deportation has steadily increased according to official De­partment of Homeland Security statistics.

In 2013 alone, over 438,000 immigrants were deported under the Obama administration, with 240,000 of these individuals having no prior criminal record.

In summer 2011, a Mexican immigrant, Daniel, was deported after being arrested for driving with an expired license. He had been living in the United States for over 12 years, having married an American woman whom he had a child with. Prior to his trivial arrest in Seattle, Daniel had an otherwise completely clean criminal record (The New York Times, “Crossing Over, and over”, 10.02.2011).

The treatment of immigrants by Ameri­can authorities and political institutions of­tentimes reflects the ingrained nativism that still exists in many parts of American society. Immigrants who hold jobs, abide by the law and legitimately contribute, both economical­ly and culturally, to the United States are de­ported regularly. These draconian laws stand in stark contrast with America’s status as a “melting pot” of differing cultures and ideas.

The mindset of anti-immigration activ­ists is one of homogeny and resistance to the concept that immigrants are a benefit to the nation, not a detriment. Immigration yields benefits both economically and culturally, as migrants bring with them not only a wealth of labor skills and solid work ethics, but also a multitude of cultural practices and identities that serve to enrich American culture.

For example, between 2009 and 2011, the average economic output for foreign citizens was around 14.7 percent (this includes unau­thorized immigrants). The percentage of eco­nomic output is higher than the percentage of immigrants that make up the United States’ population, which is around 13 percent (Eco­nomic Policy Institute).

The cultural benefits of immigration are often overlooked as well. Pulitzer Prize win­ning author Junot Diaz immigrated to the United States from the Dominican Republic as a young child. As a result of his American ed­ucation and his experiences as an immigrant, Diaz produced some of the finest works of the 21st century.

Since then, Diaz has also become an out­spoken critic of American policy towards im­migration. Many immigrants are deprived of this opportunity to fulfill their potential as a result of discriminatory and nativist attitudes towards immigration.

Immigrants are a cornerstone of Ameri­can society, culture and economics. Donald Trump’s promise to “build a wall” and popular support for such a policy is indicative of nativ­ism that still is ever-present in the American zeitgeist.

If greater pathways to citizenship were available, immigrants could more easily find well-paying work, receive an education, and pay taxes, all of which would inevitably lead to greater fulfilled individual potential and, subsequently, heightened ability to make solid and long-lasting contributions to the United States.

Nativists must reconcile that they are the descendants of immigrants and live in a coun­try built on the labor of immigrants. An open border policy may appear unattainable in the immediate future, but it is a necessary mea­sure that the U.S. must strive towards in order to enrich the nation’s population and reaffirm the instrumental values upon which the coun­try was founded.

When Americans can recognize the inher­ent freedom of movement that every individ­ual is endowed with at birth, the tangible and invaluable benefits immigrants provide for the nation and the right for immigrants to pursue greater economic opportunity, then reform to America’s broken immigration system will be possible. Immigrants are people with dignity and they must be treated as such. They make up the American identity, and it’s time for the rest of the country to acknowledge this.


  1. Why do folks on the political left always assume that an opposition to illegal-immigration equates with an opposition to immigration in general?

    Intentional obfuscation of this point only weakens the argument of the editorial.

  2. Freedom of movement? What is this garbage?

    Border control and lengthy and tedious immigration policies exist for a reason: to protect our nation from a flood of unregistered, illegal immigrants.

    Part of the reason Trump and likeminded politicians are getting this much praise is because we see what’s happening in Europe: virtually unrestricted refugees and illegal immigrants flooding the European Union, breaking welfare systems and being a burden on society.

    • So true John and not to mention cities and neighbors being destroyed by vicious gang members, drugs heavily pouring in and sex and child trafficking. They need to apply at the front door just like in other countries yes we have rules .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to Misc@vassar.edu.