Cushing demands maintenance action

On Sept 17, Cushing House Team, driven by a series of housing issues within the dorm, passed a resolution demanding better living conditions.

The resolution covers a wide array of issues that, although not new, have come to a head for residents this year. It decries conditions in Cushing as unfair given the $11,980 students are charged annually for Room and Board, par­ticularly in light of the failure of the Office of Residential Life to live up to its promise for an effective, seven-days-per-week housekeeping service for each of the dorms and understaffing in Buildings and Grounds.

As a response to these problems, the reso­lution lists student expectations for what the quality of living in Cushing should be, such as getting prompt responses to service requests and infestation reports, regular cleaning and restocking of bathrooms, fair treatment of the custodial staff, and increased communica­tion between residents and maintenance staff. Cushing House President Anish Kanoria ’18 explained in an emailed statement, “Condi­tions, in terms of pests and the lack of bath­room necessities, this year have deteriorated significantly when compared to last year. The problems of cleanliness, broken furniture and the like have been enduring issues that, in my opinion, should have been addressed earlier.”

He continued, “We believe that the recent instances of wasps frequenting our bath­rooms and residents having to buy their own pest-control spray are examples of how the college does not provide us with the basic ser­vices we pay for. Cushing House Team decided to take a stand now because we felt the condi­tions in the house posed a real danger to the health and safety of our residents.”

According to Kanoria, drafting of the resolu­tion began when House Team members report­ed multiple complaints about house conditions from residents at their “House Climate” dis­cussion, during which Cushing House Advisor Anders van Minter suggested creating a res­olution. With House Team approval, a work­ing group was formed to draft this resolution, which was quickly passed.

Van Minter offered his support, comment­ing, “I appreciate the clear articulation of student concerns that the Cushing resolution brings forward. The most important thing ResLife can do is to ensure that residents have a safe and secure living and learning environ­ment. As such, the biggest issue that ResLife needs to address in Cushing House is the es­tablishment of clear communication between students, the house team and B&G around is­sues of safety and security.”

He continued, “ResLife needs to continue to help the Cushing house team build a house culture where residents take pride in their liv­ing environment, hold each other accountable for maintaining a healthy environment, and re­port issues they are aware of appropriately in a timely manner. Additionally, ResLife needs to continue to support residents of Cushing, and advocate on their behalf when necessary.”

Anticipating a critical response from admin­istrators, Kanoria noted that, though it is stu­dents’ responsibility to keep their own spaces clean, the problem is far deeper. “Some of the issues we raise, like wasps and the lack of toi­let paper in our bathrooms, does not fall under the purview of the residents,” he noted. “These are larger structural issues about the rate of re­sponse to complaints, such as the crumbling in­frastructure of buildings on campus (especially dorms) that have not been renovated and the way the college chooses to spend our money.”

Kanoria also pointed out that while the Res­olution is specifically written about Cushing House, many other residential houses deal with similar living issues, especially the older dorms that have not been recently renovated. Main House President Mark Lawson ’18 com­mended Cushing House Team for the passing of the resolution, asserting that their concerns apply to his constituency as well. He com­mented, “Main is experiencing a lot of sim­ilar issues within our walls, and so drafting a similar resolution is definitely a possibility. To provide residents with the best possible living situation, as well as giving custodial staff the appreciation and resources they need, well, I don’t see who suffers from that. There is room to improve, and I applaud Cushing for taking this first step.”

While some of the other dorms, like Jewett House, have recently been renovated, students living there as well have taken up the cry for better housing conditions. Jewett House Pres­ident Kohei Joshi ’18 remarked, “I have never considered asking for the same in Jewett, as we have been renovated recently and do not have lots of the problems Cushing has. Sometimes, some of our bathrooms do get skipped in terms of cleaning and replacing paper towels and toi­let papers, though I found that talking to the building manager and the cleaning staff them­selves has been very effective. I think that fos­tering a good relation with these people first can be a very effective solution.”

Cushing’s resolution was soon passed on di­rectly to Director of Residential Life Luis Inoa, Director of Operations Jeff Horst, Dean of of Strategic Planning and Academic Resources Marianne Begemann and Vice President for Finance and Administration Bob Walton. As of Sept. 21, Inoa has responded to the resolu­tion with a few updates. Via Inoa, Buildings & Grounds had reported that after walking around the dorm and checking nine of Cush­ing’s 12 bathrooms, they found all were fully stocked and clean. With the exception of one clogged water fountain, they reported that all seemed to be in order with the bathrooms.

ResLife reported, however, that they would commence pest control starting Monday night at 7:30 p.m. in two of the Cushing bathrooms. Inoa also reported that he is set to meet with members of ResLife, Buildings & Grounds and Cushing House Team to address housing con­dition concerns.

In addition to the efforts put forth by Cush­ing House Team, VSA Operations Commit­tee is currently working out a more thorough resolution covering student housing concerns across campus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to