Sustainability scholar encourages movement inclusivity

David Orr-21799892946
Courtesy of Parsons School of Design

On Sept. 22 in the Villard Room, renowned en­vironmentalist, author and Paul Sears Dis­tinguished Professor of Environmental Studies and Politics at Oberlin College David Orr gave a lecture entitled “Higher Education in a Hotter Time: rambling thoughts about how we got in this mess and what we can do about it.”

After brief introductions by faculty members and President Catharine Hill, Orr began the lec­ture on a sobering note. He stated, “There’s not a person in this room who doesn’t have a carbon footprint, we’re all implicated in this. So there are no real good guys and bad guys…we’re all part of this. Now we have to think our way out of it. Evolution hasn’t wired us necessarily to do this.”

Orr soon after delved into the connection be­tween environmental issues and social justice issues, linking the two by critiquing American culture and government. Using stark visual aids, Orr stressed the wildly disproportionate effect that the United States has in particular. “The American dream is a carbon-intensive dream,” he lamented. “This is a problem for which there is no known solution.”

Referencing his experience and success with integrating sustainability, Orr went on to de­scribe the Oberlin Project, a cooperative sustain­ability initiative between Oberlin College and the surrounding community that he spearhead­ed in the Ohio college town. The project’s goals included constructing ecologically conscious buildings like a sustainable hotel that will replace the old Oberlin Inn, as well as the Adam Joseph Lewis Center for Environmental Studies on the college’s campus. “In our case what was im­portant was a renewable facility,” Orr remarked. “[The hotel] will be, as far as I know, the first entirely renewably-powered hotel in the world.” The Lewis Center, already well established since its completion in 2001, is not only energy effi­cient but also a net energy exporter, sharing its excess with the larger community.

Drawing on the similarities between Vassar and Oberlin, Orr urged students to think of sus­tainability in a more inclusive way. He and Vas­sar students alike want a sustainable future to be possible for all. DivestVC Coordinator Elise Ferguson ’17 posited, “Sustainable communities are for everyone, not just the privileged.” When speaking about the Oberlin Project, Orr made sure to emphasize the importance of accessibili­ty. One project in the community sector has been construction of entirely solar-powered houses. “The question for us,” he said, “was could we do this at a rate of cost affordable to somebody below the poverty line?” As it turned out, the answer was yes, as high performance and solar powered homes are being built in Oberlin and made available to people of all financial means.

Students involved in social justice and envi­ronmental groups on campus, however, will tes­tify to the difficulty of making spaces green in a way that is inclusive and accessible to all. Fer­guson commented, “If Vassar were to do [some­thing like the Oberlin Project], we would have to work very carefully with the community in a way that empowers them and involves them. There has to be a background structure of laws and regulations that deters gentrification, because the environmental movement is increasingly trendy.” She and Vassar Greens President Ga­brielle Pollack ’17 concurred that gentrification, loss of resources and displacement can too easily occur when a city is made more environmentally conscious.

When asked about the connection between social and environmental justice issues, Pollack put it in plain terms. She explained, “[W]e can’t have social justice if we’re not having the envi­ronment. If you don’t have a place to live, there’s going to be no platform to have any social jus­tice.”

Orr stressed not only accessibility for envi­ronmental movements, but also a change in the politics surrounding them. He argued, “It doesn’t really matter if you’re a Republican or a Demo­crat, I want to argue that this is something that is genuinely bipartisan.” Positing that many mis­understand what a sustainable economy could and should be, he remarked at his support for the integration of sustainable practices into existing economic and social structures rather than advo­cating for mass political reform.

True to the title of his talk, Orr made sure to discuss the importance of greater integration of environmental issues across the board in higher education. He insisted, “We can do it in higher education: it’s your brainpower, it’s your mon­ey, it’s your investment. But it means we need to rethink how we operate schools.” The senti­ment is echoed by many students, who hope that professors and students will not shy away from talking about environmental issues when and wherever they are relevant, and who hope that they will begin to hear new voices at such dis­cussions. Ferguson said, “The lecture was pretty well attended, but I feel like most people were people who I recognized from environmental classes…We need to talk about [the environment] in classrooms.”

Despite feeling discouraged by a general lack of drive at Vassar to replicate the success of sus­tainability movements at peer institutions like Oberlin, many students reported having been reassured by Orr’s words. Pollack said, “Some­times you feel like, ‘I’m in my own world with these environmental issues and the only people that care are also people that are my age, so what can we do to make a change?’ Then when some­one who’s a very known environmentalist [says], ‘Yeah, you’re right,’ that’s a very affirming kind of point.”

Despite the gravity of the issues at hand, Orr urged his audience to remain active in the movement and hopeful for a brighter future. He advised, “If you’re pessimistic you won’t do any­thing, if you’re optimistic you won’t do anything, but if you’re hopeful you have to do something.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to