Cyborgism, relationship with tech under microscope

Michael Chorost is one of many speakers set to deliver lectures on technology and its relationship with humans. The “Sonic Cyborg” lecture series will shed light on cyborgism and transhumanism. Photo courtesy of Vassar College

Cyborgs are coming to Vassar—but they look more human than one might suspect.

Technology theorist, author and public speaker Michael Chorost will be opening for “Sonic Cyborgs,” a free, public series of lec­tures exploring often taboo or unmentioned topics like cyborgism, transhumanism and technology. His lecture, entitled “What It’s Like to Go Deaf and Get Your Hearing Back with an Implanted Computer (And What That Means for Theory)” will be held on Wednesday, Feb. 24, at 5:30 p.m. in Taylor Hall, room 203.

After losing all hearing in 2001, Chorost re­ceived a cochlear implant and now speaks as a leading authority on neural prosthetics. He studied computer programming, Renaissance literature and cultural theory at University of Texas at Austin for his PhD, and is an advocate for the blurring of lines between disciplines. On his website, he says, “[Both the sciences and arts are] profoundly creative human endeavors.” His memoir, “Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human,” was writ­ten as a response to his profound relationship with deafness and sound, and was deemed the first of its kind by the L.A. Times.

Chorost’s second book, “World Wide Mind,” draws from his experience of being physically integrated with implanted computers in order to extrapolate what being a cyborg might mean in the future–rather than becoming unfeeling robots, he suggests that technology be used to let us reconnect with emotion, touch and what it means to be human. According to his web­site, “Humanity can incorporate the computer into its collective soul in a way that enhances communities and creative work instead of di­minishing them.”

Chorost’s writing addresses exactly what the “Sonic Cyborgs” series seeks to understand. Chorost poses the question, “When the senses become programmable, can we trust what they tell us about the world? Will cochlear implants destroy the signing deaf community? And above all, are cyborgs still human?”

The proposal for the “Sonic Cyborgs” lecture series was born out of conversation between Professor of Music Justin Patch and Professor of Physics and Astronomy, and Science, Tech­nology and Society Jose Perillan. According to Perillan, “Justin and I both love science fiction and had talked about science fiction in the past, and I think that’s probably where these conver­sations started.”

It seems natural, then, that Chorost will be the first lecture in a series about relatable, re­al-life science fiction. Perillan explains, “The human experience is so wide and varied that everybody has a different approach as to how they are in their own skin and how they are in their own body and how they interact with the world, and so [Michael Chorost] draws com­parisons and contrasts between his own pro­cess and how he goes on rebuilding and push­ing through some of the early, really difficult stages of relearning how to hear and re-engag­ing with the hearing world.”

Additional events in the series include a lec­ture from Professor of Science and Technology Studies and Professor of Sociology at Cornell University Trevor Pinch as well as a conversa­tion between Chorost and Pinch on Thursday, Feb. 25, at 7 p.m. in Taylor Hall, room 102. Ac­cording to his website, Pinch’s research focuses on the sociology of technology and its relation­ship to and role in human interaction. He just finished editing a book on hearing and hosts a weekly radio show.

A second set of “Sonic Cyborgs” lectures will continue during April 11 to April 15 with a talk from the first legally-recognized cyborg, Neil Harbisson, who can hear colors through a skull-based antenna as a way to combat lifelong achromatopsia, or complete color blindness. In a short film, “The Man Who Hears Color,” Har­bisson is quoted as saying, “I don’t feel that I’m using technology, I don’t feel like I’m wearing technology…I feel like I am technology.”

Musician Marco Donnarumma, interested in the fusion of science and technology with per­formance art, will also be speaking.

According to Donnarumma’s website, “[His work relies] on the material force of sound to produce intensely intimate encounters of bodies and machines, and vivid sensory and physical experiences…His creative process is a continuous feedback between artistic intu­ition, scientific experiments and development of custom technologies.”

Learning from cyborgs has the potential to transform an individual’s relationship with technology. Patch mentions that his exposure to Chorost completely flipped his line of think­ing. “The ways in which you thought sound was a fundamental thing is shown not to be true,” he said. It is this truth, then, that Sonic Cyborgs aims to seek out—in a world of cyborgism, what exactly does it mean to be human? And how exactly will the notion of humanity change as technology changes with us?

“Sonic Cyborgs” and Chorost’s lecture are made possible by Creative Arts Across Disci­plines, an initiative funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Aiming to facilitate greater integration of the creative arts across campus, CAAD centers each academic year’s program­ming around a sense-based theme, this year’s being “Sound and Silence.”

According to Interdisciplinary Arts Coordi­nator Tom Pacio, “CAAD will be at All College Days on the 24th and we hope students, faculty, administrators, and staff stop by the table to learn about the initiative and everything we are doing.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to