Climate Action Plan aims for carbon neutrality by 2030

The restored Groveville hydropower plant in Beacon, combined with a solar power initiative, will replace 20 percent of Vassar’s fossil fuel consumption with renewable alternatives. Courtesy of Vassar College/Karl Rab
The restored Groveville hydropower plant in Beacon, combined with a solar power initiative, will replace 20 percent of Vassar’s fossil fuel consumption with renewable alternatives. Courtesy of Vassar College/Karl Rab
The restored Groveville hydropower plant in Beacon, combined with a solar power initiative, will replace 20 percent of Vassar’s fossil fuel consumption with renewable alternatives. Courtesy of Vassar College/Karl Rab

Although classes have only just begun, the 2016-2017 year is already proving to be event­ful, as the Office of Sustainability recently an­nounced its Climate Action Plan (CAP) was ap­proved by President Catharine Bond Hill. While Hill has since left the College, the plan will be presented to Vassar’s next president as part of their responsibility to uphold. Her approval was contingent on endorsement by the Sustainability Committee, the Master Planning Committee and the Priorities and Planning Committee.

The CAP’s primary authors are Sustainability Coordinator Alistair Hall ’11, Associate Professor of Geography and Chair of Geography and Fac­ulty Sustainability Coordinator Mary Ann Cun­ningham and Associate Dean of Strategic Plan­ning Thomas Porcello, with the help of student sustainability interns. The plan is the result of a joint effort between the Office of Sustainabili­ty, officially established in 2015, and the College Committee on Sustainability, created in 2001 as a senior thesis project.

While Vassar has been conscious of its carbon footprint for some time, the consensus among the Office and Committee was that the 2011 Green­house Gas Reduction Plan that was in place need­ed revision. They worked throughout the 2015- 2016 academic year to develop a comprehensive set of guidelines and goals for making Vassar a more environmentally progressive campus. The ultimate objective is to reach carbon neutrality by 2030. Sustainability Coordinator Alistair Hall asserted, “We believe [it] is an ambitious but ulti­mately feasible goal.”

The CAP, which is available for the public to read online, consists of five main proposals: the establishment of administrative objectives; social­ly and fiscally appropriate allocation of resources; consideration of master planning; effective ener­gy management and engagement with the Vassar community.

The greenhouse gas policy outlined in the plan follows the parameters set by the World Resourc­es Institute Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which dif­ferentiates between three categories of emissions. The first is direct, on-campus burning of fossil fu­els, such as in the central heating plant. The sec­ond is comprised of off-site but directly attribut­able emissions, which includes energy purchased for the campus. The third consists of all other emissions, such as from waste and transportation. Hall elaborated, “[T]here are different philoso­phies on what you include there. Some colleges do not include travel. We have.” This travel alloca­tion includes expenses associated with students and faculty traveling to and from the College on breaks, admissions officers visiting high schools and even Junior Year Abroad.

Being cautious about long-distance travel is one way students can reduce emissions. Sus­tainability intern Sophie Bedecarré-Ernst ’17 re­marked, “I really would like to emphasize the car­bon impact that air travel has. Especially in terms of JYA, there is a huge carbon footprint that we rarely think about. Pursuing other means of travel can be a really positive experience, too, particu­larly for travel to and from school over winter and summer breaks.” However, Hall assured, “This doesn’t mean that we’re going to stop people go­ing abroad, but I think there’s an educational op­portunity to be had around the costs, hidden and real, associated with our day to day practices.”

As the CAP was developed at the same time as the Campus Master Plan underwent revisions, building renovations and new constructions fac­tor heavily into the CAP. The plan discourages undergoing construction unless the existing infra­structure cannot accommodate academic needs that arise, but also provides guidelines should ad­ditions be necessary.

New buildings on campus, such as the Bridge for Laboratory Sciences, will be designed to be innovative and as close to carbon neutrality as possible. Certain architectural codes such Leader­ship in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) could be employed as well. The CAP also strives to meet the 2030 Challenge established by the non-profit Architecture 2030, a coalition of archi­tects and engineers committed to creating usable, reliable guidelines for designing carbon-neutral buildings. Sustainability interns also drafted fur­ther green building guidelines over the summer and those amendments are in deliberation.

Retroactive energy efficiency is just as im­portant as constructing new green buildings for reducing carbon emissions. The central heating plant is the entity with the highest emissions, at 39 percent of all 2015 campus emissions. “It’s a large natural gas system; it heats about 80 percent of campus, all of the dorms, all of our academic buildings and it’s been around since the early 1900s,” Hall explained. “It’s a really big embedded part of campus infrastructure, so coming up with a plan for what is the future of that facility, that doesn’t include fossil fuels, [is important].” Oth­er renovations include modifying electricity use. The CAP reads, “Recent and forthcoming LED lighting retrofits for the Parking Lots, AFC, the Pool, Buildings & Grounds, and Rocky Hall rep­resent a five percent reduction in our total elec­tricity usage.”

There are several projects to look forward to in the coming months. Last fall, the Office of Sus­tainability announced that they intend to replace 20 percent of campus energy use with renewable energy sources, including a solar initiative and hydropower contract with a facility in Beacon. The College began using the hydropower plant in August, and is awaiting the first report in Septem­ber to determine its effectiveness. Another pro­spective project is the installation of a metering system in the winter in all of the residential and senior housing to track energy usage, which will allow both administration and students to moni­tor differences in consumption.

The CAP is not only a document for the use of the Office of Sustainability or associated offices and persons, but is intended to be a tool for in­terdepartmental collaboration to achieve mutual goals. Sustainability intern James Falino ’17 not­ed, “[I]t was a huge relief to our office that the work we put in for the past few years has been approved and that we got to crowdsource ideas from other orgs, professors and even a past stu­dent’s thesis. Collaboration is key.” The CAP can inform other offices and organizations on campus in their decision-making, to ensure that every as­pect of life at Vassar can be the least taxing on the environment as possible.

Student support for the CAP will also be nec­essary to ensure it is successful, as will taking initiative to reduce personal impact on the en­vironment. Falino opined, “I think sustainability is a great way for students to get involved with a social justice issues on campus and have an im­pact on how Vassar and its administration sets goals and marks progress. It allowed me to inter­act in meetings with administrators and realize that students are necessary to advocate for these initiatives to succeed.” The Office of Sustainabil­ity campaigns assure students that while they can definitely make small changes in their own lives to help conserve energy and resources, the CAP reminds them that they are part of a larger community for which every member should take some responsibility. Vassar itself is one individu­al institution among many in the nation working towards carbon neutrality. Hall asserted, “[W]e’re not working on this alone. New York City wants to reduce their emissions by 80 percent by 2050. There’s a goal to have half of New York state’s power come from renewable sources by 2030. We can now say we’re one of 600-plus other colleges that have made goals like this.”

The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is increasingly in the national and global con­versation, but the concept that these actions are imperative is not globally or even nationally ubiq­uitous. The hope that many organizations and in­stitutions in the movement have is that their vocal and public advocacy will help convince govern­ments to take actions. “I think we’re at a stage in the country and globally where leadership mat­ters,” Hall affirmed. “[M]yself and a few of my colleagues at a few other colleges, Swarthmore, Yale and elsewhere, have been having regular conversations about how we advocate nationally for carbon pricing and larger-scale policy initia­tives that would potentially be some ways to curb carbon emissions on a larger scale. I think that’s something colleges are well-suited to do. Why does NYC care, why does any major city care? In the absence of national leadership, this is one way we can be role models and inspire larger change.” Falino agreed, “Colleges and universities come in to show that [institutional change] is possible, to collaborate with one another, and to contribute best practices to the greater, governmental di­alogue on how we need to change to live more sustainably.”

In the end, the success of the CAP and of larg­er-scale progressive environmental policies, from the college campus to the national scale, will de­pend on intersectional collaboration and creative thought about how to make effective and rapid changes to protect the environment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to