Celebrity culture during pandemic reveals excesses of American reverence

Despite a national obsession with heavy words like “independence” and “freedom,” Americans seem obstinately stuck in the search for a figurehead––whether that be a politician or a reality TV star. However, in the midst of the country’s third wave of COVID-19, celebrity culture presents a new problem. What do we do with celebrities who, in accordance with our adoration, believe they’re somehow immune both to the coronavirus and public backlash?

In what seems to be a constant struggle between our devotion and vitriol for public figures, public outrage operates more as an outlet for our frustration than a genuine attempt at correcting behavior. And celebrities never fail to provide reasons for this release, from the Kardashians pretending “things were normal just for a brief moment” by throwing a lavish party for 40 guests on a private island, to California Governor Gavin Newsom attending one of his lobbyist friends’ unmasked birthday dinner. These actions are a mockery of the nearly half a million lives lost to COVID-19, and current methods fail to change this behavior. However, we continue to swing between the extremes of love and hate for famous people. In a culture where any public figure can be elevated to the height of celebrity, how do we reckon with the consequences? 

The dubious answer that comes to mind is cancel culture, a process of online policing and censorship that often misses the point. Cancel culture almost never satisfies the public’s initial desire for retribution. Instead, it leaves a confused mess of pointless discourse, turning the original issue with an individual into a collective problem to be hashed and re-hashed into oblivion. In a few cases, this method of cancellation ends in concrete forms of due process, but usually only with the most egregious and horrifying transgressions, such as the actions of Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby. But in most cases this mayhem, instead of posing direct and immediate consequences for the offending individual, results in little besides temporary disgrace. J.K. Rowling’s infamous transphobic statements are one case study. After cancel culture came for her, J.K. Rowling’s book sales actually skyrocketed in England. Even Louis C.K. returned to stand-up, selling out shows after multiple women accused him of sexual assault. Despite this process’s ineffectiveness, it’s hard to resist. It speaks to our desire to have control of the public sphere but not much else, as the important social issues raised in these debates are usually overshadowed by personal attacks and unconscious recapitulation of insidious police culture. 

Many people would acknowledge that cancel culture is fundamentally a toxic way to hold others accountable, especially when their offenses are not immediately violent. Most of the time, individual infractions symbolize a larger systemic problem. Cancel culture is more complicated within the private sphere––it’s much easier to cancel a celebrity than it is to cancel a friend––and its limitations and impracticalities are made much more visible. If someone you knew was throwing parties during the pandemic, you would probably let them know they were actively endangering others rather than cut off all communication and shame them relentlessly online, right? Instead of teaching people a lesson or “raising awareness,” I’d argue that cancel culture just encourages people to hide their bad behavior rather than change it. 

This being said, the many examples of celebrities’ carelessness, especially during the pandemic, make it difficult to know how to respond––like Jake Paul throwing huge parties while claiming the pandemic is “a hoax” or the Chainsmokers performing at a concert that flouted social-distancing guidelines in the Hamptons over the summer. The mindset behind this negligence is arguably more disturbing than the actual events. It shows a certain rupture from reality, even when it concerns such irrefutable matters as contagious diseases––not to mention the example they set for fans, who might not have access to the same top-tier healthcare and rapid testing. Considering most Americans’ reverential perception and treatment of famous people, it’s no wonder that celebrities have a skewed view of their own importance. The attempt to “deplatform” celebrities through cancel culture is simply an effort to retain public control over the narrative, a struggle to display some kind of democracy in celebrity culture. While celebrity culture requires a dialogue between the performer and the public, it becomes all the more complicated considering the unquestionably universal experience of COVID-19––there really isn’t any room for constructive discussions. Celebrities’ irresponsible behavior in the pandemic and our inability to properly challenge them beyond online shaming calls both their egos and our reverential culture into question. 

One Comment

  1. The reason celebrity culture needs to be canceled is there is nothing worth celebrating about some of these people anymore. If someone has a specific, unique talent, they can be admired but not worshipped. These so-called celebrities shouldn’t be given special privileges over average folks.
    Celebrities are now in the hospitality business so it’s in their best interest to be good to their fans. Playing make-believe in front of a camera is now something everyone can do. It’s not remarkable art.

    Parasocial relationships are pointless. Being a big fan of a person is idolatry. The cast of Friends isn’t going to help me when I have a flat tire. A game show host isn’t going to attend your sibling’s funeral or be there in your time of need. The actors on Supernatural aren’t going to wait in a food bank line with you or babysit your child. Write a letter to your favorite celebrity and see what happens? Ask your favorite celebrity for a job. They will ignore you because they feel entitled to compliments and privileges. They aren’t grateful people. They are bottomless pits of greed and self-interest.

    Most celebrities believe they are superior. I wonder why they feel that way. The PR reps spin hype and lies to promote celebrities well beyond their actual talents. They use bots and fake comments to influence your thoughts and your eyes towards these people and words to describe them as fantastic beings. I beg you all to look in the other direction. Please stop buying into their propaganda. It’s all manipulation or thirst traps and biological tricks. I can’t stress enough how celebrities don’t care about you or anybody else that isn’t feeding their egos.

    Most people recognize these are just people begging the world to notice them. The new trick is to try to get empathy and sympathy for these celebrities. Please recognize it as a ploy to get your attention so you’ll buy their nonsense or buy their products. Celebrities now prey on empathetic and kind people. It’s a big con job. Why help any of them get wealthy if they aren’t helping you in any way?

    Ask yourself what a celebrity can do FOR YOU and what WILL a celebrity do FOR YOU. Most likely, they do nothing for anyone but themselves. The culture needs to die off. You’d be in a better position attending events in your local community. You’d be in a better position visiting your neighbors and getting to know the folks down the street. Most celebrities have nothing more to offer the world.

    I regret the attention I gave celebrities but my generation was raised in front of a television. Society normalized the idea that being seen on film or in a movie was something admirable. Society normalized the myth that celebrities were something more than just people standing in front of cameras.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Miscellany News reserves the right to publish or not publish any comment submitted for approval on our website. Factors that could cause a comment to be rejected include, but are not limited to, personal attacks, inappropriate language, statements or points unrelated to the article, and unfounded or baseless claims. Additionally, The Misc reserves the right to reject any comment that exceeds 250 words in length. There is no guarantee that a comment will be published, and one week after the article’s release, it is less likely that your comment will be accepted. Any questions or concerns regarding our comments section can be directed to Misc@vassar.edu.